Floridas Controversial Curriculum: Analyzing the Perceptions of Slaverys Impact on My MBA Career

Last Updated on July 24, 2023 by Robert C. Hoopes

Title: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Faces Criticism Over Controversial School Curriculum

Word Count: 313

In a bid to secure the Republican presidential nomination for 2024, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis finds himself defending a controversial school curriculum that has sparked intense debate. Specifically, the curriculum’s treatment of slavery in Florida middle schools has come under scrutiny.

DeSantis staunchly defends the curriculum, arguing that it presents factual information about enslaved persons and their contributions. He asserts that these individuals acquired skills during their enslavement that they later utilized in profitable crafts. However, he distances himself from the specific assertions made in the curriculum, maintaining that he was not involved in its development.

Critics question the accuracy and objectivity of the curriculum, suggesting that it might be rooted in a particular political ideology. They also express concerns about the potential impact of the curriculum on students’ understanding of history, particularly the legacy of slavery in the United States.

The Florida Department of Education’s social studies standards for the 2023-2024 academic year include a benchmark that teaches students about enslaved persons developing skills for personal benefit. However, it remains unclear what this benefit refers to.

The controversial curriculum covers a wide range of duties and trades carried out by enslaved persons, including agricultural work, painting, carpentry, tailoring, domestic service, blacksmithing, and transportation. While some argue that highlighting the skills acquired by enslaved individuals sheds light on their resilience, others contend that it may inadvertently downplay the brutal realities they faced.

As DeSantis vies for the GOP primary nomination, his hard-right record, including his defense of this curriculum, could be viewed favorably by primary voters. However, it may also pose a challenge in attracting more moderate voters.

The ongoing debate over history education and the influence of political ideology is once again brought to the forefront by this curriculum controversy. It underscores the importance of ensuring that historical education is accurate, comprehensive, and unbiased, while also recognizing the significance of diverse perspectives in shaping a holistic understanding of the past.